Margaret Holben Ellis, the Eugene Thaw Professor of Paper Conservation at New
York University, gave a recent Brown Bag Lunch talk entitled “Paper is Part of
the Picture.” Ellis, who also serves as Director of the Thaw Conservation
Center at Morgan Library and Museum, has done extensive research on the history
of paper-making, paper’s forms and uses over time, and its conservation. Her
talk at Bard Graduate Center focused on the present-day lack of understanding
about the history and varied properties of paper in the museum, conservation,
and academic fields. She pointed out that we interact daily with paper but
probably do not consider its unique and significant qualities. “Most of us
spend considerable time looking at and interpreting written, printed, and drawn
marks on paper. We mentally untangle these marks that are on the paper, but
what about the paper on which the marks appear?,” asked Ellis. She continued,
saying, “Surely paper is part of the picture. Just like we can decipher or read
the marks, we can also read the paper, and reading paper will increase its
meaning.”
Ellis believes a thorough
knowledge of the structural and visual qualities of antique and contemporary
types of paper is necessary for understanding the multitude of objects that are
made of paper or incorporate paper. She argued that paper “is overlooked and
under-described” for two main reasons: paper’s properties are not nearly as
important to us as they were in the past and these properties are hard to
accurately describe. In the past, many people had a heightened understanding of
different types of paper and their physical features for varied uses. She
shared that one kind of antique paper had a distinct “rattle” when shaken due
to a finishing process that entailed dipping the paper into gelatin. This
coating prevented paper from absorbing ink, making it a valued type of writing
paper. Artists, such as Rembrandt van Rijn (1606-1669), chose special types of
hand-made paper to use for their drawings, paintings, and etchings. Rembrandt
and other etchers would have used a specialized, fuzzy paper that enabled ink
to transfer more easily from fine lines on copper plates. She stressed that
paper has numerous qualities that should be studied, especially in the field of
art. Knowing what type of paper an artist chose to use as well as the paper’s
physical role strengthens the understanding of the whole work and helps reveal
the artist’s creative process and intention.
Ellis
noted how paper is not discussed often in art historical scholarship and that a
correct, descriptive language for paper studies is needed. “I find it strange
that few truly evocative and informative descriptions of paper are found in the
literature of art. Not only are observations about the paper substrates of
prints and drawings rarely mentioned. There exists a curious lack of language
to describe the paper,” she observed. Ellis recommended studying paper more
in-depth using multiple senses as well as expanding the terminology used for
describing paper and its qualities, underscoring the importance of
acknowledging the “mechanical/structural” and “optical” features of paper
types. She shared examples of specific terms that she believes are key to
helping scholars understand the varied properties of paper. For looking closely
at the mechanical/structural qualities, Ellis recommended that it is important
to study the grammage, thickness, texture (is it hot pressed or cold pressed?),
grain, two-sidedness, formation (is it laid, wove, or wild?), porosity, and
finish. For examining the optical properties, she advised gauging the
transparency, opacity, brightness, color, gloss, and fluorescence of paper.
“It’s only by becoming fluent in the language of paper as spoken by the paper industry,
paper historians, and paper chemists, can we come up with more precise and
consistent and thus more meaningful vocabulary to be used to evoke the
properties of paper,” Ellis asserted as she concluded her talk.
